Cultural dimensions: factor analysis of Textor"s A cross-cultural summary

  • 190 Pages
  • 1.97 MB
  • 6219 Downloads
  • English
by
Human Relations Area Files , New Haven, Conn
Textor, Robert B.,, Ethnology -- Dictiona
Other titlesCross-cultural summary.
Statement[by] Robert A.C. Stewart.
GenreDictionaries.
SeriesHRAFlex book -- W6-001., Cross-cultural research series, HRAFlex books
The Physical Object
Paginationvii, 190 l.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17774234M

Cultural dimensions: factor analysis of Textor’s A cross-cultural summary. Cross-Cultural Research Series. HRAFlex Photocopied. Textor, Robert B. A cross-cultural summary. Cloth. Udy, Stanley H Organization of work: a comparative analysis of production among non-industrial peoples.

Paper. Winkelman, Michael James. Shamans. Cultural dimensions: Factor analysis of textor's 'A cross-cultural summary'.

A report from the work was published as a book by the New Haven, Connecticut Human Relations Area Piles in the HRAFIex series.

The goal of this article is to come to a synthesis of the insights from relevant authors and present a set of clusters of cultural dimensions based on systematic theoretical and statistical analysis. Cross-Cultural Analysis is the sequel to Culture's Consequences, the classic work published by Geert Hofstede, one of the most influential management thinkers in today's de's original work introduced a new research paradigm in cross-cultural analysis: studying cultural differences through nation-level dimensions (complex variables defined by intercorrelated items).

This is accomplished by using a structure resulting from factor analysis (Hofstede, ). This theory has been used as an example for several fields, particularly in cross-cultural psychology (Hofstede, ).

Geert Hofstede’s original cultural dimensions theory had four dimensions from which cultural values could be analyzed. PhD Massey University, New Zealand (–). "Cultural Dimensions: Factor Analysis of Textor's "A Cross-Cultural Summary." A report from the work was published as a book by the New Haven, Connecticut Human Relations Area Piles in the HRAFIex series.

Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory describes the effects of a society's culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behavior, using a structure derived from factor analysis.

6 dimensions of Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; (1) Power Distance Index (PDI), (2) Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV), (3) Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI), (4) Masculinity vs. employers of IBM within more than 40 countries. Using factor analysis of gathered data (average points of each country), Hofstede shows that there are 5 main dimensions which could not be described with other factors like as job level, economic development of the country; these dimensions can best describable by factors like cultural features [2].

In a cross-cultural study in which a scale of family values was administered to students from 27 countries, strong support for structural equivalence was found when exploratory factor analysis was used (Van de Vijver, Mylonas, Pavlopoulos, & Georgas, ), whereas a tedious process was needed in which some items and a country were excluded.

Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication, developed by Geert shows the effects of a society's culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behaviour, using a structure derived from factor analysis.

Serving on a cross-cultural project team and taking the time to get to know and bond with your global colleagues is an excellent way to develop skills.

Once you have a sense of the different cultures and have started to work on developing your cross-cultural skills, another good practice is to “boost your cultural metacognition” and monitor. In this paper, I discuss the Hofstede cultural dimensions as applied to Chinese culture in terms of Chinese values, communication norms, and differences with other cultures.

The analysis. British anthropologist Mary Douglas () proposed a two-dimensional ordering of ways of looking at the world: 1. ‘Group’ or inclusion - the claim of groups over members, and 2. ‘Grid’ or classification - the degree to which interaction is subject to rules.

Douglas saw these categories as relating to a wide variety of beliefs and social actions. Geert Hofstede has completely rewritten, revised and updated Culture's Consequences for the twenty-first century, he has broadened the book's cross-disciplinary appeal, expanded the coverage of countries examined from 40 to more t reformulated his arguments and a large amount of new literature has been included.

The book is structured around five major dimensions: power distance. The Value of Values in Cross-Cultural Research: A Special Issue in Honor of Shalom Schwartz. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. The case of cultural dimensions and personal pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, – Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor.

I first set out to replicate the Inglehart-Welzel analysis of the two cultural dimensions based on data for 12 questions. I immediately ran into problems as the various documentation on the website has several differing lists of variables included in the factor analysis, and trying all three, none replicated the values for the factors in the.

c "Cultural dimensions: factor analysis of Textor's 'A Cross-Cultural Summary,' " HRAFIex Book W, New Haven, Human Relations Area Files. RS, SS, T, Google Scholar.

Leung, K. Bond, M. On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 20 Little, T. Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues Multivariate Behavioral Research 32 The Hofstede model of national culture consists of six dimensions.

Details Cultural dimensions: factor analysis of Textor"s A cross-cultural summary PDF

The cultural dimensions represent independent preferences for one state of affairs over another that distinguish countries (rather than individuals) from each other. The country scores on the dimensions are relative, in that we are all human and simultaneously we are all unique.

Cross-Cultural Analysis is the sequel to Culture’s Consequences, the classic work published by Geert Hofstede, one of the most influential management thinkers in today’s de’s original work introduced a new research paradigm in cross-cultural analysis: studying cultural differences through nation-level dimensions (complex variables defined by intercorrelated items).

"Culture's Recent Consequences: Using Dimension Scores in Theory and Research," International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, Vol. 1 no.

Download Cultural dimensions: factor analysis of Textor"s A cross-cultural summary FB2

1,"Masculine and Feminine Cultures," in (Ed. in Chief), Encyclopedia of Psychology, Volume 5, Washington D.C. and New York: American Psychological Association and Oxford. It presents the details of the 5 factors differentiating cultural values (and much more).

It is a 'short' version ( pages) of his work, easy to read and meant for non-academics. The long and detailed version of his academic work is found in his other book "Culture consequences".

It is /5(88). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication, developed by Geert describes the effects of a society’s culture on thevalues of its members, and how these values relate to behavior, using a structure derived from factor analysis.

Hofstede developed his original model as a result of using factor analysis to examine the results of a world. Factor analysis is a frequently used technique in cross-cultural research. It serves the purpose of extracting cultural dimensions.

Description Cultural dimensions: factor analysis of Textor"s A cross-cultural summary FB2

The best known cultural dimensions models are those elaborated by Geert Hofstede, Ronald Inglehart, Christian Welzel, Shalom Schwartz and Michael Minkov.

Advantages. Gerard Hendrik (Geert) Hofstede (2 October – 12 February ) was a Dutch social psychologist, IBM employee, and Professor Emeritus of Organizational Anthropology and International Management at Maastricht University in the Netherlands, well known for his pioneering research on cross-cultural groups and organizations.

He is best known for developing one of the earliest and most. Hofstede () was the first researcher to reduce cross-national cultural diversity to country scores on a limited number of dimensions.

Hofstede’s work provided researchers with a consistent quantification of cultural differences between countries, causing a surge in empirical studies about the impact of culture on the activities and performance of multinational firms (Kirkman et al. Armand R. Cerbone, in The Initial Psychotherapy Interview, Summary.

In summary, gay-affirmative psychotherapy acknowledges the influences of antigay cultural bias, both conscious and unconscious, in psychotherapy and seeks to reduce their interference in order to realize positive psychotherapeutic regards the basis for the stigma and distortions that continues to.

This is accomplished by using a structure resulting from factor analysis (Hofstede, ). This theory has been used as an example for several fields, particularly in cross-cultural psychology (Hofstede, ). Geert Hofstede’s original cultural dimensions theory had four dimensions from which cultural values could be analyzed.

They were analyzed by conventional psychometric procedures (e.g., item analysis, factor analysis, generalizability analysis) to establish nine dimensions of societal culture. By the end of this process, over middle managers in 62 cultures participated in the study to measure cultural values and practices in each country.

Cross-cultural/national research is essential for both scholars and practitioners. Although the methodological issues specific to this research have long been acknowledged in the literature, recent studies confirm that the standards demanded by earlier studies have not been met.

Accordingly, we review some of the most relevant methodological issues involved in cross-cultural/national research. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis is a statistical technique that can be used to examine cross-cultural measure equivalence. The goal of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis is to establish structural invariance of a measurement model across groups.Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions US vs.

India Geert Hofstede’s theory of cultural dimensions was a result of an analysis of a world-wide survey of employee values by IBM in the ’s and ’s. This theory describes the effects of a society’s culture on the values of that culture’s members and how those values relate to behavior.This paper only used a few European nations and only 2 of the 6 cultural dimensions.

Lopes & Serrasqueiro () wrote a paper on The influence of culture and transparency on global research and development intensity: An overview across Europe where they did a cross cultural study on Europe testing the impact of culture on general human.